is easy to say that English cinema is shit, in fact, there are numerous examples that support this theory: from the comedies of embarrassment as "brain drain" to increí ; BLES pain in the ass, with a beautiful photography andhas an agonizingly slow pace of many of those considered great directors. There is also some international recognition, as would Almodovar, but I think that in recent years is limited to do over and over again the same movies, but without the sharpness of his earlier work.
to this is that about girlse; adirle its absolute dependence on subsidies, stupid laws that have been created for the supposed protection as one in which English cinema is only considered if there is a percentage of the English team so "Pan's Labyrinth" could not be considered as such, the general attitude of the current minister (which, incidentally, has a Goya for best screenplay)
In between all this tide of bad movies subsidized mandatory fees television screen so there are good works and good directors, but sadly always the same. That is why "Celda
At first I thought it would be a plagiarism of the typical American movies about prison riots, all put to shoehorn in the English context. I was wrong ... in part. It remains true that the typical clichés of the genre that in Spain are not given, but then you have moments, like the ETA prisoners, which seemed very original because all situacióny framed the interests of the mutiny in a far more interesting parameters ofin time, not forced to fall into the typical existentialism to mean many things. Ie not in discussions about social injustice, or despair, or the panopticon (which always fall on the politically correct.) Not lost in philosophies about human nature. However, is there background, without the scenes to make fools flares viewers, which I appreciate deeply.
Finally, it is easy to say
that English cinema is crap, but sometimes it's great to realize that the good thing about generalizations is that CoNLLevan exceptions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment